Saturday, April 4, 2026
Logo

American Federation of Musicians Backs Bruce Springsteen After Trump’s Personal Attacks on Tour Kickoff Day

The presidents of two major AFM chapters condemned Donald Trump’s Truth Social tirade against Bruce Springsteen as ‘unprecedented’ political bullying. Springsteen’s new tour, launched two days earlier, features pointed speeches and songs criticizing the administration.

Last updated: April 4, 2026, 6:47 AM

Share:
American Federation of Musicians Backs Bruce Springsteen After Trump’s Personal Attacks on Tour Kickoff Day

In an extraordinary display of labor solidarity, the presidents of two influential chapters of the American Federation of Musicians (AFM) have issued a joint statement in complete support of Bruce Springsteen after President Donald Trump launched a personal and vitriolic attack on the rock icon via Truth Social. The unprecedented public broadside—issued just two days after Springsteen kicked off his politically charged ‘Land of Hope and Dreams Tour’ in St. Paul, Minnesota—accused the 74-year-old songwriter of being a ‘bad, and very boring singer,’ questioned his musical legacy, and urged his MAGA followers to boycott his concerts. Dan Golub, AFM Local 802 president based in New York, and Marc Sazer, president of AFM Local 47 in Los Angeles, responded with a forceful rebuke, framing Springsteen’s activism as a core right of artistic expression and union values.

‘We cannot remain silent as one of our most celebrated members is singled out and personally attacked by the president of the United States,’ Golub and Sazer declared in their statement. ‘From Nebraska to Born to Run, his music has spoken truth to power for decades, and that is exactly what he is doing now. Musicians have the right to freedom of expression, and we stand in complete solidarity with Bruce and every member who uses their platform to speak their conscience. Local 802 and Local 47 will always defend that right.’ The union leaders emphasized that Springsteen’s decades-long commitment to social justice aligns with the labor movement’s history of fighting for civil rights, economic equity, and democratic values.

Why Bruce Springsteen’s Tour Is a Political Flashpoint in 2024

Bruce Springsteen’s ‘Land of Hope and Dreams Tour,’ which launched on April 26 in Minnesota, was explicitly designed to be a political statement. In his pre-concert remarks to a sold-out arena, the Jersey-born troubadour delivered a searing indictment of the Trump administration, calling it ‘corrupt, incompetent, racist, reckless, and treasonous.’ He framed the evening not as a concert, but as a collective call to action: ‘Tonight, we ask all of you to join with us in choosing hope over fear, democracy over authoritarianism, the rule of law over lawlessness, ethics over unbridled corruption, resistance over complacency, unity over division, and peace over war.’ The tour’s title itself is a nod to his late father’s words and a metaphor for American redemption—a theme that has resonated deeply with fans who view Springsteen as a moral compass.

Springsteen’s Long History of Political Engagement and its Consequences

Springsteen’s political activism is not new. During the 2020 election cycle, he endorsed Joe Biden and performed at the Democratic National Convention. He has long used his music to critique inequality, police violence, and economic injustice, with songs like ‘Streets of Philadelphia’ and ‘American Skin (41 Shots)’ becoming anthems of social protest. His support for the ACLU’s campaign to defend birthright citizenship—using his song ‘Born in the U.S.A.’ in an ad opposing Trump’s proposed constitutional amendment—marked another escalation. In January 2024, a White House representative dismissed Springsteen’s criticism as ‘random songs with irrelevant opinions and inaccurate information,’ signaling an escalation in rhetorical hostilities between the artist and the administration. When Springsteen announced the tour’s title in March, another White House official called him a ‘loser’ suffering from ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome’—a phrase frequently used by the president and his allies to dismiss political opponents as mentally unfit.

The American Federation of Musicians: A Labor Institution Defends Its Own

The American Federation of Musicians, founded in 1896, is the largest labor union representing professional musicians in North America, with over 80,000 members across the U.S. and Canada. AFM Local 802, based in New York City, is one of the most influential chapters, representing musicians in the entertainment capital of the world. Local 47 in Los Angeles, another major hub, covers the heart of the recording and film industries. Springsteen, a lifelong union member, is affiliated with AFM Local 47 and Local 399 in Asbury Park, New Jersey. His union ties run deep: he has repeatedly praised the labor movement, featured union musicians on his albums, and used concerts to raise funds for worker organizations. The joint statement from Golub and Sazer—two elected leaders with decades of advocacy for musicians’ rights—signals a rare moment where a major labor union publicly backs a member against a sitting president.

‘This isn’t just about Bruce Springsteen,’ said Golub in a follow-up interview. ‘It’s about every musician who dares to speak out. When the president uses his bully pulpit to silence dissent, he sets a dangerous precedent. We’re saying no—artists have rights, and unions will protect them.’ Sazer added, ‘In an era when public discourse is increasingly weaponized, artists like Springsteen remind us that music can be both entertainment and a form of protest. That’s worth defending.’ The statement has been widely circulated among musicians and labor activists, drawing support from figures in jazz, classical, and rock genres.

Trump’s Truth Social Rhetoric: From Insults to Organized Boycott

Trump’s Truth Social post, published on April 28, went beyond mere insults. He wrote: ‘Bruce Springsteen, a very boring singer and musician, has become a political hack. He should have kept his mouth shut and just sang his songs. He’s a total loser! And by the way, let’s give Springsteen a boycott! He hates our Country (which is a Total Disaster), and it shows!’ The post echoed language used by the White House in January when a spokesperson dismissed Springsteen’s song ‘Streets of Minneapolis’—a track critics say references the deaths of two immigrants at the hands of ICE agents—as ‘irrelevant opinions.’ In 2021, Trump had previously told supporters that Springsteen ‘ought to KEEP HIS MOUTH SHUT,’ signaling a consistent pattern of targeting artists who oppose his policies.

The call for a boycott mirrors Trump’s 2016 attack on the Broadway production of *Hamilton*, when he demanded that the cast apologize for reading a statement after the election urging ‘calm’ in the face of his victory. That incident led to a surge in ticket sales and a public rebuke from theater unions. Springsteen has downplayed the political blowback, telling the *Minneapolis Star Tribune* in late March: ‘My job is very simple: I do what I want to do, I say what I want to say, and then people get to say what they want to say about it.… I don’t worry about if you’re going to lose this part of your audience. I’ve always had a feeling about the position we play culturally, and I’m still deeply committed to that idea of the band. The blowback is just part of it. I’m ready for all that.’

The Broader Implications: Art, Power, and the Right to Dissent

The confrontation between Springsteen and Trump is not merely a clash of personalities, but a broader struggle over the role of art in public life. Throughout U.S. history, musicians, writers, and filmmakers have used their platforms to challenge authority, from Billie Holiday’s ‘Strange Fruit’ to Public Enemy’s ‘Fight the Power.’ Springsteen’s case underscores a growing tension: as political polarization deepens, artists are increasingly targeted for expressing dissent, while labor unions—historically champions of free speech—are stepping into the fray to defend them. The AFM’s solidarity statement is part of a larger trend in which unions, from the Writers Guild of America to the Screen Actors Guild, have taken public stances against censorship and political interference in creative work.

‘This is about more than one artist,’ said Todd Wolfson, a labor historian at Rutgers University. ‘It’s about whether the public square remains open to diverse voices. When the president weaponizes social media to silence critics, it sends a chilling message to every worker, every artist, every citizen who believes in democratic dissent.’ The AFM’s move may inspire other unions to take bolder stances. Already, the Recording Artists’ Coalition and the Screen Actors Guild‐American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (SAG-AFTRA) have issued statements expressing solidarity with Springsteen, framing the issue as a defense of free expression across industries.

What’s Next: Tour, Boycott, and the 2024 Election

As the ‘Land of Hope and Dreams Tour’ continues across the U.S., with stops in Chicago, Detroit, and Philadelphia, Springsteen’s political messaging shows no signs of abating. Fans and critics alike are watching to see whether Trump’s call for a boycott gains traction. So far, early tour dates have sold out within hours, and secondary market ticket prices have surged—mirroring the pattern seen during the Hamilton controversy. Springsteen’s team has not formally responded to the boycott call, but in a recent interview with *Rolling Stone*, his manager, Jon Landau, said: ‘Bruce has always said that music and politics are inseparable in America. This tour is no different.’

Political analysts suggest that Springsteen’s activism could energize young voters and progressives ahead of the 2024 election. His alignment with the ACLU and his public criticism of Trump’s policies—especially immigration and racial justice—resonate strongly with key Democratic constituencies. Meanwhile, Trump’s Truth Social attacks, though widely mocked by critics, are likely to solidify his base’s opposition to Springsteen and other ‘woke’ artists. The AFM’s statement adds a new layer to the cultural conflict, signaling that organized labor will not remain neutral in the face of what they view as political intimidation.

  • The AFM’s Local 802 and Local 47 presidents issued a joint statement condemning Trump’s Truth Social attack on Bruce Springsteen, framing the assault as an attack on artistic freedom and union values.
  • Springsteen launched his politically charged ‘Land of Hope and Dreams Tour’ on April 26 in Minnesota, delivering a speech calling the Trump administration ‘corrupt, incompetent, racist, reckless, and treasonous.’
  • Trump’s Truth Social post accused Springsteen of being a ‘bad, and very boring singer,’ urged a boycott, and repeated the White House claim that the artist suffers from ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome.’
  • The AFM, representing over 80,000 musicians, has taken a rare public stand against a sitting president, signaling escalating labor-artist solidarity in the face of political censorship.
  • The confrontation reflects a broader cultural struggle over the role of art in dissent, with unions and creative industries increasingly mobilizing to defend free expression in 2024.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Bruce Springsteen say at the opening of his tour?
At the April 26 concert in Minnesota, Springsteen told the audience: ‘The America that I love, the America that I’ve written about for 50 years, that’s been a beacon of hope and liberty around the world, is currently in the hands of a corrupt, incompetent, racist, reckless, and treasonous administration.’ He urged attendees to choose hope over fear and democracy over authoritarianism.
How has the Trump administration responded to Springsteen’s criticism?
The White House has dismissed Springsteen’s political statements as ‘irrelevant opinions’ and accused him of suffering from ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome.’ Trump personally attacked Springsteen on Truth Social, calling him a ‘bad, and very boring singer’ and urging a boycott of his concerts.
Why is the American Federation of Musicians’ statement significant?
The AFM’s joint statement from Local 802 and Local 47 presidents is a rare public defense of a member artist against a sitting U.S. president. It signals growing labor solidarity with artists facing political backlash and underscores the union’s role in protecting freedom of expression.
CB
Christopher Blake

Entertainment Editor

Christopher Blake covers Hollywood, streaming, and the entertainment industry for the Journal American. With 12 years covering the entertainment beat, he has interviewed hundreds of filmmakers, actors, and studio executives. His coverage of the streaming wars and box office trends is widely read.

Related Stories