FCC Bans Foreign-Made Routers: What the New Wi-Fi Security Rule Means for Your Home Network

In a sweeping move aimed at safeguarding American infrastructure, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) on March 23 announced a ban on the sale of new Wi-Fi routers manufactured outside the United States, citing "unacceptable risks" to national security. The regulation marks one of the most aggressive steps yet in the federal government’s broader crackdown on foreign technology perceived as potential vectors for cyber espionage or sabotage. While the agency has granted no exemptions to date for new models, existing routers already authorized by the FCC will remain legal for use—temporarily. The decision sends ripples through an industry where over 60% of routers are produced in China, including brands like TP-Link, Netgear, and Asus. Experts warn the move could disrupt consumer access to affordable devices, strain supply chains, and accelerate a long-overdue push for domestic manufacturing—even as critics question the bluntness of the instrument and the lack of coordination with ongoing cyberdefense funding gaps.

Key Takeaways: What the FCC Router Ban Means for You

• The FCC’s ban, effective immediately, prohibits the sale of new routers where any major stage of manufacturing, design, or development occurs outside the U.S., affecting nearly all major brands except Starlink’s Texas-made models.
• Existing routers already authorized by the FCC are safe to keep using, but firmware and software updates may stop after March 1, 2027, unless the router is later approved under a conditional exemption.
• Consumers are advised to wait before buying new routers until clarity emerges on which models will receive FCC exemptions, as unapproved devices could become unsupported and unsafe to use.
• The move is part of a broader federal push to harden U.S. digital infrastructure against foreign cyber threats, including incidents like the Salt Typhoon campaign that exploited Cisco routers to breach major telecom networks.
• Routers rented from internet service providers—used by nearly 70% of Americans—will also be affected, as most rely on foreign-made components.

Why the FCC Is Banning Foreign-Made Routers Now

The FCC’s decision follows years of escalating concern among U.S. intelligence and defense agencies about the vulnerability of consumer-grade network devices to foreign interference. Citing classified intelligence reports, the agency directly linked foreign-made routers to cyberattacks such as Volt Typhoon, Flax Typhoon, and Salt Typhoon—campaigns allegedly orchestrated by state-backed actors targeting critical infrastructure. The Salt Typhoon operation, for instance, compromised Cisco routers to infiltrate the networks of major U.S. internet providers, including AT&T, Verizon, and Lumen Technologies (formerly CenturyLink and Quantum Fiber). These incidents raised alarms about the potential for backdoors, firmware tampering, or supply chain risks in widely distributed devices.

The move also aligns with broader policy directives from the Trump administration, which has prioritized reshoring sensitive technology supply chains and reducing reliance on Chinese manufacturing. FCC Chair Brendan Carr, in a public statement, emphasized continuity with this agenda: *“Following President Trump’s leadership, the FCC will continue to do our part in making sure that U.S. cyberspace, critical infrastructure, and supply chains are safe and secure.”*

A History of Tension Over Router Security

Concerns about router security are not new. In 2020, the U.S. government added Huawei and ZTE to its ‘Entity List,’ effectively banning their telecommunications equipment from federal networks due to espionage risks. While Huawei primarily produces telecom infrastructure, its consumer routers and modems have also faced scrutiny. The current ban extends this logic to all foreign-made routers, regardless of brand. Critics, however, argue that the FCC’s approach is overly broad and lacks nuance. William Budington, a technologist at the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), criticized the move as a blunt instrument: *“This is using an extremely blunt instrument, and it’s going to impact many harmless products in order to stem a real problem.”* He also pointed to a paradox: federal defunding of cyberdefense initiatives has left the U.S. without robust testing labs for consumer-grade routers, undermining the very infrastructure needed to vet devices safely.

How the Ban Works: What’s Actually Prohibited?

The FCC’s ban targets any Wi-Fi router where any major stage of its lifecycle—including manufacturing, assembly, design, or development—occurs outside the United States. This means even routers assembled in the U.S. using foreign components could be subject to the ban if key design or development stages occurred abroad. The rule applies only to new models not yet authorized by the FCC before March 23, 2024. Existing routers already cleared by the FCC remain legal for use, including those currently on store shelves or installed in homes.

To date, the FCC has not granted any ‘Conditional Approval’ exemptions for new router models, according to the agency’s official FAQ page. Manufacturers can apply for exemptions, but the process is opaque, and no timelines have been publicly shared. Brands that fail to secure exemptions will be barred from selling new devices in the U.S. market—potentially leaving consumers with outdated or unsupported hardware.

The Risk of Unsupported Routers

One of the most immediate concerns for consumers is firmware and software support. Most modern routers rely on regular firmware updates to patch security vulnerabilities, improve performance, and support new standards. The FCC’s notice explicitly states that authorized routers may continue to receive updates “at least until March 1, 2027.” The phrasing “at least” suggests the deadline could be extended, but there’s no guarantee.

“The risk is very real. If you find yourself in a situation where that update pipeline has been switched off, then you definitely have to consider whether you want to keep using that device.” — Rik Ferguson, vice president of security intelligence, Forescout

“The risk just keeps going the longer time passes, because chances are that there will be new vulnerabilities being found that you cannot patch.” — Daniel Dos Santos, vice president of research, Forescout

Without updates, a router becomes increasingly vulnerable to malware, botnets, or exploitation by threat actors. Security researchers warn that unpatched routers can serve as entry points for broader network compromises, especially in smart homes with multiple connected devices.

Should You Rush to Buy a New Router—or Wait?

Given the uncertainty surrounding exemptions and firmware support, most experts advise consumers to pause new purchases. Alan Butler, senior counsel at the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), likened unapproved routers to “pumpkins in a year,” referring to the likelihood that many devices will lose update support by March 2027. Sergey Shykevich, threat intelligence manager at Check Point Research, recommended waiting “at least a few weeks or a month” to assess the real-world implications of the ban.

Consumers currently in the market for a new router would be wise to delay their purchase until manufacturers clarify which models will receive FCC exemptions. Even routers currently on shelves could become unsupported if their design or manufacturing chain falls under the ban retroactively—a possibility the FCC has not ruled out. In the meantime, existing routers remain safe to use, provided they continue to receive updates.

Which Router Brands Are Most Affected?

Nearly every major Wi-Fi router brand available in the U.S. operates with some foreign involvement in its supply chain. According to industry analysis, approximately 60% of routers in the U.S. are manufactured in China, with additional production hubs in Vietnam, Thailand, Indonesia, and Taiwan. Starlink is the notable exception: the company manufactures its newer routers in Texas, making them the only fully domestically produced option currently on the market.

Statements from Major Manufacturers

Major router companies have largely responded with cautious support for the FCC’s decision, while emphasizing their commitment to U.S. operations and security standards. Netgear, for example, highlighted its U.S. headquarters and security-first design philosophy in a statement: *“As a U.S.-founded and headquartered company with a legacy of American innovation, Netgear has long invested in security-first design, transparent practices, and adherence to government regulations, and we will continue to do so.”*

TP-Link, which has faced particular scrutiny due to its Chinese ownership and manufacturing ties, stated that the FCC’s move aligns with its own plans to expand U.S.-based production. *“Placing all manufacturers and their supply chains under the same scrutiny is a positive step in the direction of making the router industry more secure,”* a TP-Link spokesperson said. The company notes that it has manufactured all products sold in the U.S. in Vietnam since 2018, but has signaled plans to relocate more production to American facilities.

Other companies contacted by CNET—including Asus, D-Link, Eero, Linksys, Nest, Razer, and Synology—did not respond to requests for comment. The lack of transparency from some manufacturers underscores the complexity of untangling global supply chains and verifying compliance with the new rule.

Impact on ISP-Rented Routers and Broadband Customers

Nearly 70% of American households rent their routers from internet service providers (ISPs), according to broadband analytics firm Ookla. These routers, often bundled with subscription plans, are typically foreign-made and will also be subject to the FCC’s ban. A 2026 analysis by Ookla, which reviewed speed tests from major ISPs, found that none of the top three Wi-Fi router vendors used by the largest providers (including AT&T, Verizon, and Xfinity) are manufactured entirely in the U.S.

For consumers who rent equipment, this could mean a forced upgrade cycle if their ISP cannot secure FCC exemptions for current models. While ISPs may absorb some costs, customers could face higher fees or mandatory switchovers to approved devices.

Broader Implications for the Tech Industry and U.S. Manufacturing

The FCC’s ban is part of a larger geopolitical and economic shift aimed at reducing U.S. dependence on foreign technology. The move could accelerate reshoring efforts, particularly in semiconductor and networking hardware, but it also risks disrupting a mature global supply chain that has kept consumer prices low for decades. Experts caution that the transition to domestic production may be slow and costly, especially for small and mid-sized manufacturers.

“I don't think it's going to change the manufacturing landscape, because manufacturing processes are expensive to move and device manufacturers are probably going to just wait it out until the ban is lifted. So I don't think it's going to have the intended effect.” — William Budington, technologist, Electronic Frontier Foundation

The decision also raises questions about collaboration with allies. Many U.S. allies, including Japan, South Korea, and parts of Europe, are also strengthening their domestic tech manufacturing—but few have implemented blanket bans on foreign-made consumer devices. The FCC’s approach may strain international trade relations and create inconsistencies in global supply chains.

What Should Consumers Do Now?

For now, the safest course of action is to avoid purchasing a new router until more information is available. Consumers should check the FCC’s official roster of authorized devices and any updates to the ‘Covered List’ on the FCC’s website. If you already own a router, continue using it as normal, but monitor for firmware updates. Consider backing up your network settings and preparing for a potential upgrade in early 2027 if your device is not exempted.

If you rent a router from your ISP, contact your provider to inquire about their compliance plan and whether your current device will remain supported. Ask whether you’ll be required to upgrade and whether any costs will be passed on to you.

Frequently Asked Questions