Paramount Stock Surges 11% After $24B Middle East Funds Join WBD Takeover, Deal Targets September Close

Paramount Global’s beleaguered stock soared nearly 11% on Tuesday after the company confirmed deep-pocketed Middle East sovereign wealth funds would inject $24 billion into its $110 billion takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery, validating investor optimism about the beleaguered media giant’s future. The surge, which pushed shares to $10.90—a level not seen in months—came amid unprecedented trading volume and signaled growing confidence in the embattled deal, despite lingering regulatory and political hurdles. The injection of fresh capital from Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund (PIF), Qatar Investment Authority, and Abu Dhabi’s L’imad Holding Co. not only bolsters the merger’s financial underpinnings but also marks a geopolitical milestone, as state-backed entities from the Gulf region assume significant stakes in one of America’s most recognizable media empires.

Key Takeaways: Why the $24B Middle East Investment in Paramount-WBD Matters

• Paramount Global’s stock surged 11% to $10.90 after Middle East funds committed $24B to its $110B Warner Bros. Discovery merger, validating investor confidence in the embattled deal.
• The trio of sovereign wealth funds—Saudia Arabia’s PIF, Qatar Investment Authority, and Abu Dhabi’s L’imad—are joining U.S.-based investors RedBird Capital and LionTree to finance the acquisition, with the deal on track for a September close.
• Regulatory scrutiny looms as Democrats demand a CFIUS review, citing national security concerns over foreign government stakes in CBS, CNN, and local broadcast stations, though Paramount asserts the investors will have no governance role.
• Backed by Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison, the merger aims to create a media powerhouse with $110B in combined revenue, but faces competition from foreign ownership debates and competing bids, including Netflix’s rejected $82.7B offer for Warner assets.

The $110 Billion Merger: A Lifeline for Paramount in a Media Industry Crisis

Paramount Global’s $110 billion bid to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery represents more than just a corporate takeover—it is a survival strategy for one of Hollywood’s oldest studios, which has seen its stock plummet 20% in 2025 amid declining linear TV revenue, streaming losses, and intense competition from Netflix and Disney+. The deal, first announced in late 2024, would merge two of the industry’s most storied assets: Paramount’s CBS broadcast network, Showtime, and Pluto TV with Warner Bros. Discovery’s HBO, CNN, and Warner Bros. film and TV studios. Together, the combined entity would command an estimated $110 billion in enterprise value, creating a media behemoth with over $50 billion in annual revenue—a critical mass needed to compete in an era dominated by tech giants and global streamers.

Why Paramount Needed a White Knight

Paramount’s financial troubles have mounted as cord-cutting accelerates, with traditional pay-TV subscribers declining at a double-digit annual rate. The company’s streaming division, Paramount+, has struggled to gain traction against Netflix and Disney+, while its ad-supported networks face eroding viewership and pricing power. In 2024, Paramount reported a net loss of $4.5 billion, driven by writedowns of its film library and restructuring costs. The Warner Bros. Discovery merger, initially proposed by Paramount in early 2024, was seen as a way to stabilize the company by leveraging WBD’s stronger international footprint and profitable streaming platforms like Max (formerly HBO Max). However, the deal’s progress has been marred by shifting investor sentiment, competing bids, and now, geopolitical complexities.

Middle East Funds Inject $24 Billion, But at What Cost?

The injection of $24 billion from Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund (PIF), Qatar Investment Authority, and Abu Dhabi’s L’imad Holding Co. is the largest single foreign investment in a U.S. media company in decades. The PIF, led by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, has emerged as a major global investor, backing everything from Newcastle United FC to Lucid Motors. For Paramount, the funds provide not just capital but strategic partnerships in content production and distribution. However, the involvement of state-backed entities has raised eyebrows on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers are increasingly scrutinizing foreign investments in sensitive U.S. industries. While Paramount insists the Middle East investors will have no role in corporate governance, critics argue that sovereign wealth funds—even passive ones—can influence media narratives and editorial decisions, particularly at outlets like CBS News and CNN.

The idea of funds controlled by the governments of Saudi Arabia, Abu Dhabi and Qatar being stakeholders in the CBS broadcast network, local stations, CNN and other assets has raised alarms among many Democrats. Some have insisted in recent months that the merger would have to be reviewed by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States.

A History of Gulf Investments in U.S. Media and Entertainment

The Middle East’s foray into U.S. media is not unprecedented. In 2016, a group led by Saudi Arabia’s PIF acquired a 30% stake in 21st Century Fox’s regional sports networks, later selling them to Sinclair Broadcast Group. More recently, Abu Dhabi’s International Media Investments (IMI), backed by Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan, has become a major player, acquiring stakes in BuzzFeed and forming a joint venture with RedBird Capital to invest in media properties. RedBird, founded by former Goldman Sachs partner Gerry Cardinale, has deep ties to Paramount—Cardinale sits on the company’s board and has advised David Ellison, son of Oracle’s Larry Ellison and CEO of Skydance Media, which is acquiring Paramount. The Ellison family remains the deal’s principal backer, with Larry Ellison pledging to guarantee any shortfall if the Middle East funds do not cover their commitments.

Regulatory and Political Headwinds: CFIUS and the FCC’s Role in the Merger

The merger faces dual regulatory scrutiny from the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), both of which have the power to block or impose conditions on the deal. CFIUS, chaired by Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, reviews foreign investments for national security risks, while the FCC regulates media ownership to prevent monopolistic control over local news and broadcast markets. Democrats in Congress, led by Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), have called for a CFIUS review, arguing that the presence of state-backed funds from Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the UAE could pose risks to U.S. interests. ‘Foreign ownership of American media companies is a legitimate national security concern,’ Blumenthal told reporters in April. ‘We cannot allow geopolitical adversaries to exert undue influence over our information landscape.’

Paramount’s Defense: No Governance, No Problem

Paramount has sought to allay concerns by emphasizing that the Middle East investors will have no role in the governance or editorial decisions of the merged company. In an SEC filing, the company stated that the syndication of equity is ‘an important milestone’ that will not impact the deal’s timing or likelihood of closing. ‘The diversification in ownership of Paramount will unlock the potential for strategic and commercial opportunities with the equity syndication partners,’ the filing read. However, critics argue that even passive investments by sovereign wealth funds can lead to subtle pressure or conflicts of interest, particularly in a global media landscape where editorial independence is already a flashpoint.

Competing Bids and the Ellison Family’s High-Stakes Gamble

The Paramount-WBD merger is not the first attempt to take over Warner Bros. Discovery. In 2023, Netflix submitted a $82.7 billion all-stock bid for the company’s film and TV studios, as well as its streaming assets. However, WBD’s board rejected the offer, opting instead for Paramount’s higher-priced cash-and-stock deal. The Ellison family, through their investment vehicle Skydance Media, has emerged as the primary backer of the merger, with Larry Ellison personally pledging to cover any shortfall in funding. Skydance, which has a history of backing high-profile films like ‘Top Gun: Maverick’ and ‘Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning Part One,’ is positioning itself as a savior for Hollywood’s legacy studios. ‘This deal is about preserving American storytelling in an era of consolidation,’ David Ellison told *Variety* in March. ‘Paramount and Warner Bros. represent two pillars of global entertainment, and together, they can compete with the tech giants.’

The Broader Implications: Gulf Investments Reshape Global Media

The involvement of Middle East funds in the Paramount-WBD merger is part of a broader trend where sovereign wealth funds and state-backed entities are leveraging their financial firepower to gain influence in Western media. Saudi Arabia’s PIF, for example, launched the LIV Golf league in 2022, poaching top PGA Tour players with nine-figure contracts to create a rival circuit. Abu Dhabi’s IMI has invested in BuzzFeed and partnered with RedBird to acquire stakes in companies like Artists Equity, a production entity co-founded by Matt Damon and Ben Affleck. These investments are not just financial—they are strategic, aimed at reshaping global narratives and cultural influence. For Hollywood, which has long relied on international box office revenue, particularly from China and the Middle East, the trend presents both opportunities and risks. On one hand, Gulf investments could fund new productions and expand into underserved markets. On the other, they raise questions about editorial independence and the potential for foreign governments to shape media content.

What’s Next for the Merger? Timeline, Risks, and Potential Outcomes

Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery have set a target closing date of September 30, 2025, but the deal faces several potential roadblocks. First, the CFIUS review could result in conditions or a block, particularly if the committee determines that the Middle East investors pose a national security risk. Second, the FCC could impose ownership restrictions, particularly on local broadcast stations, to prevent monopolistic control. Third, competing bids or shareholder lawsuits could derail the process. If the deal closes as planned, the merged entity would be the second-largest U.S. media company by revenue, behind only Disney. However, integration risks loom large, as combining two corporate cultures, legacy assets, and streaming platforms will require massive restructuring. ‘Mergers of this scale rarely go smoothly,’ said media analyst Craig Moffett of MoffettNathanson. ‘The real test will be in the execution—can they actually deliver on the synergies they’re promising?’

The Human Cost: Layoffs and Industry Consolidation

As with most major media mergers, the Paramount-WBD deal is expected to result in significant job cuts, particularly in corporate functions like finance, legal, and operations. Analysts estimate that the combined company could shed thousands of jobs in a bid to reduce costs and improve profitability. For Hollywood workers—from writers and actors to behind-the-scenes crews—the consolidation trend has been a double-edged sword. On one hand, larger companies have more resources to invest in productions. On the other, the industry’s shift toward fewer, bigger players has reduced competition for talent and creative control. ‘Consolidation means fewer jobs, less diversity in storytelling, and more power concentrated in the hands of a few executives,’ said a senior writer at a major studio who requested anonymity. ‘It’s not just about the money—it’s about who gets to decide what stories get told.’

Frequently Asked Questions